So my biology professor was lecturing the other day and randomly spit out a little known fact that really got me thinking. He briefly explained that if only two children were allowed to each family in the world then the rapidly decreasing necessities for humanity would be restored. I couldn’t believe that after all the obstacles we face with this problem and it’s seemingly dark fate that this is all we need to do.
This seems like it would be such an easy thing to do and as serious as not having food is you’d think we would strive for a solution. However, there are cultures on this earth that support reproduction for no other than ego. If a man can produce a lot of children then he’s a “real stud” according to their customs. Good luck making these people choose abstinence. Then, some farmers rely on having large families to work the farm. Maybe they can’t afford to pay workers and have to use children. Who knows, that could have a huge impact on farm communities.
Impoverished communities often have large families. The lack of education and purpose may lead to reproducing more often and at younger ages. People who don’t have knowledge of contraceptives would more than likely end up as parents. In some cultures, contraceptives are not accepted because of religious beliefs. That right there extremely impacts population numbers.
Another question is how would we go about enforcing this law. Many people want large families just because of desire. Do we incarcerate them or penalize them? Accidents happen and kids are made. This law would also interfere with rights in many countries. It almost has a dictatorship feel to it but if it was for the best then could we argue?
That's a very interesting debate. There are pros and cons to both sides-I can't believe that having 2 children would completely solve all of the nations deprivations! Although it would solve many problems, I don't think its fair to limit people to only two kids.
ReplyDelete